[rspec-users] Spec'ing via features

Shane Mingins smingins at elctech.com
Mon Nov 24 16:33:44 EST 2008

On 25/11/2008, at 7:29 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> Lately I've been putting more and more stuff into ATs.  I'm finding it
> valuable to keep tests for domain logic separate from plain ol unit
> tests...meaning that my Account object may be tested mostly with
> Cucumber, but helper objects such as a stats aggregator will be spec'd
> with code-level examples.
> Pat
> _______________________________________________

Just wondering a bit on this ... the bit about your Account object  
being tested mostly through Cucumber vs unit tests.

In my mind (as I think about this) cucumber is more about testing than  
rspec is, meaning Acceptance Tests are more about testing where unit  
tests when using TDD is more about design than testing.  Do I make  
sense?  Email is not the best medium for conversations :- )

Now from what I have read of your writings I am assuming that you are  
using TDD .... and so just from what I read above I am wondering if  
that statement is true because TDD is driving the implementation of  
Account, and so you will have a 100% coverage of the Account class  
behaviour, but when it comes to testing, the AT is doing more of that  
(meaning testing).  Is that it?   IIRC, in Kent Beck's TDD book there  
is the example of TDD'ing a triangle (or something), but it was  
something that showed that to TDD the triangle you ended up with less  
tests than if you were testing the triangle.

How's that sound?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2423 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20081125/a4b5d0d2/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the rspec-users mailing list