[rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace
peter.a.jaros at gmail.com
Sat Nov 22 11:49:12 EST 2008
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:28 AM, aslak hellesoy
<aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> How will people know that a method is part of an API? Can we simply say that
> if it has RDoc it's part of the API and stable, and if it doesn't it's not?
> (We can still RDoc non-API code, just put :nodoc: on it so it doesn't get
> part of the API docs).
I think that would clarify the API *and* make the RDoc easier to read. :)
More information about the rspec-users