[rspec-users] Modules will no longer be automatically included in RSpec version 1.1.4
rick.denatale at gmail.com
Tue May 27 10:35:59 EDT 2008
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 8:46 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 26, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Tim Glen wrote:
>>>> So I find myself wondering - is this the case for just helper modules or
>>>> all modules? For instance, I have a module which gets included into some
>>>> controllers, but I'd like to spec against it directly so I don't have in
>>>> those other controllers... I'm not sure how to set this up. What's the best
>>> First of all, don't ever believe anybody when they tell you something is
>>> a best practice.
>>> That said - here's what I *usually* do:
>>> describe WhizBangModule do
>>> it "should do something" do
>>> whiz_banger = Object.new
>>> whiz_banger.extend WhizBangModule
>>> whiz_banger.whiz.should == "bang"
>>> or something like that. Make sense?
>> Yes, that makes sense.
>> I like that as far as it goes, but I'm wondering if there's a way to take
>> it one step further and actually have it extend the typical controller
>> functionality - some of my methods make use of the session, or set some
>> assigns, for instance. I'd love to be able to test it as if it were in a
>> controller already, with all the spec goodness that comes along with that.
>> I can set up what you've done here to answer _like_ a controller, but that
>> seems silly given that the same functionality is potentially already
>> available. I could also spec it in the context of one of the controllers
>> that includes it already, but that seems too specific.
> class WhizBangController < ActionController::Base
> include WhizBangModule
> describe WhizBangController, "including WhizBangModule", :type =>
> :controller do
> it "should do something" do
> controller.whiz.should == "bang"
Is this change something which should be highlighted for those who
don't follow the mailing list?
It doesn't seem to be mentioned in the changes list
My blog on Ruby
More information about the rspec-users