[rspec-users] Modules will no longer be automatically included in RSpec version 1.1.4
tim at pivotib.com
Mon May 26 20:22:22 EDT 2008
>> So I find myself wondering - is this the case for just helper
>> modules or all modules? For instance, I have a module which gets
>> included into some controllers, but I'd like to spec against it
>> directly so I don't have in those other controllers... I'm not sure
>> how to set this up. What's the best practice?
> First of all, don't ever believe anybody when they tell you
> something is a best practice.
> That said - here's what I *usually* do:
> describe WhizBangModule do
> it "should do something" do
> whiz_banger = Object.new
> whiz_banger.extend WhizBangModule
> whiz_banger.whiz.should == "bang"
> or something like that. Make sense?
Yes, that makes sense.
I like that as far as it goes, but I'm wondering if there's a way to
take it one step further and actually have it extend the typical
controller functionality - some of my methods make use of the session,
or set some assigns, for instance. I'd love to be able to test it as
if it were in a controller already, with all the spec goodness that
comes along with that.
I can set up what you've done here to answer _like_ a controller, but
that seems silly given that the same functionality is potentially
already available. I could also spec it in the context of one of the
controllers that includes it already, but that seems too specific.
More information about the rspec-users