[rspec-users] Rails integration tests without stories
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Sat Jun 7 16:16:48 EDT 2008
On Jun 7, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Kyle Hargraves wrote:
> I'm looking to drive the development of a rails app that does nothing
> but serve a JSON API. All of the models are well tested elsewhere, so
> I needn't worry about that. My only immediate goal is to be able to
> fire off requests to a path and check the returned JSON.
> I've tried a number of methods for this today, without being
> particularly enthused about any of them.
> I started with user stories, but the conversion to english was
> difficult for something largely developer-facing. "When I get
> /widgets/:id" where :id is actually determined behind the scenes did
> not read well, and a lot of my expectations were tough to express in
> sentence form. I've had a lot of success with stories in the
> application that is related to this API, but they don't seem to fit
> well here.
Can you post an example or two? I'd like to see what's not working for
you. No promises I can offer up anything better, but just curious.
> I tried out using standard rails test/unit integration tests, but that
> would be a suite largely divorced from all of my other specs, and I
> miss the :should syntax. Requiring spec/expectations and spec/matchers
> alleviated some of that, but
> test_names_end_up_being_unpleasantly_long_and_cumbersome. I haven't
> yet looked at the test/unit interop support, but maybe that would be
> helpful here?
> I tried to make an IntegrationExampleGroup akin to the other rails
> example groups:
> module Spec::Rails::Example
> class IntegrationExampleGroup < ActionController::IntegrationTest
> Spec::Example::ExampleGroupFactory.register(:integration, self)
> describe 'GET /widgets', :type => :integration do
> it "should ..." do
> get '/widgets'
> This roughly seems to work for the integration tests (I'd still need
> to add in transactions, maybe a few other things), but for reasons I
> haven't yet figured out means all my other specs try to run within an
> integration session.
That definitely shouldn't happen. What you have here is very close to
> Finally, I could just test the serialization methods on the model (or
> build a WidgetSerializer), and then use mocks in controller specs. But
> I'm really looking for full-stack specs here, so I'd like to avoid
> Any suggestions? The path of least resistance is probably using the
> test/unit tests, followed closely by just sucking it up and having
> awkward user stories. My preferred solution would be the
> IntegrationExampleGroup, and I may yet get that to work, but I thought
> I'd ask here while I sit on it for a bit.
The IntegrationExampleGroup should work. Let's try to figure out why
you're getting bleed into the other groups.
More information about the rspec-users