[rspec-users] "should_not ==" vs "should !="
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Mon Jan 21 09:46:30 EST 2008
On Jan 21, 2008 8:22 AM, Jim Lindley <jimlindley at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm 99 44/100% sure that you have it right. The expression x != y is
> > syntactic sugar for !(x == y) much like x += y is syntactic sugar for
> > x = (x +y)
> > The parser turns these into an internal representation (abstract
> > syntax tree for 1.8, byte-codes for 1.9) which is identical to the
> > second form.
> In 1.8 it's just syntactic sugar. But 1.9 provides actual != and !~
> methods so that you can override it in situations like this.
Oooooh. Good to know. We're not 1.9 compatible yet, but when we get
there we'll definitely add this!
> (from Ruby-Core: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/134608 )
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users