[rspec-users] Role of stories vs specs, revisited

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Sun Jan 13 07:54:52 EST 2008

On Jan 12, 2008 8:35 PM, Jay Donnell <jaydonnell at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >because if you have integration tests covering everything,
> >then you'll know pretty quickly when your tests aren't up to par.
> If we have integration tests that cover everything then why have another set of tests? At that point wouldn't it simply be duplication and wouldn't it create more work for refactorings and such?

Jay - are you familiar with Acceptance Test Driven
Development/Planning and/or Test Driven Development?


More information about the rspec-users mailing list