[rspec-users] Shoulda

Nathan Sutton nathan.sutton at gmail.com
Thu Jan 10 18:50:34 EST 2008


Also, that strikes me as strange that the current philosophy is that  
for the rspec_on_rails plugin.  I would think rails-specific matchers  
would be endorsed at some point, since rails is so big on convention.

Nathan Sutton
fowlduck at gmail.com
rspec 1.1
rspec_on_rails 1.1
rails 2.0.2

On Jan 10, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Josh Knowles wrote:

> On 1/10/08, Nathan Sutton <nathan.sutton at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey, we're currently using shoulda (http://dev.thoughtbot.com/
>> shoulda/) on a project and I saw some things that would be really  
>> nice
>> to see in rspec, namely the should_ methods, and especially the
>> should_be_restful method.  Do these go against the rspec goals at
>> all?  Or could an ambitious programmer go to town implementing these
>> for rspec_on_rails?
>
> The current philosophy is to keep these kinds of things as plugins.  A
> few of us have started to extract common matchers into a plugin which
> can be found at http://code.google.com/p/rspec-on-rails-matchers/.
> Feel free to submit a patch if we're missing something that you'd
> like.
>
>
> -- 
> Josh Knowles
> phone: 509-979-1593
> email:  joshknowles at gmail.com
> web:    http://joshknowles.com
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users



More information about the rspec-users mailing list