[rspec-users] Do you think it would look cleaner?

[Kerry Buckley]

On 2 Jan 2008, at 22:09, David Chelimsky wrote:

> On Jan 2, 2008 5:20 PM, Zach Dennis <zach.dennis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> RSpec doesn't enforce strict-order mocking.
>
> Sure it does, if you ask it to:
> http://rspec.info/documentation/mocks/message_expectations.html

Am I right, though, in thinking that you can't enforce order between  
two mocks? It would occasionally be nice to be able to say something  
like:

master.should_receive(:start).and_then(slave).should_receive(:start)