[rspec-users] Run all tests after success

Joe Van Dyk joe at pinkpucker.net
Thu Feb 21 11:29:54 EST 2008


On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:21 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Joe Van Dyk <joe at pinkpucker.net> wrote:
>  > On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:39 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >  > On Feb 16, 2008 1:21 PM, Steve <vertebrate at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >  >  > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:13:51 +0000, Steve wrote:
>  >  >  > > What was the nature of the changes. I just updated to r3312, and when I
>  >  >  > > run autotest I get:
>  >  >  > >
>  >  >  > > loading autotest/rails_rspec
>  >  >  > > /usr/bin/ruby1.8 -S script/spec -O spec/spec.opts  <all the specs> No
>  >  >  > > server is running
>  >  >  > >
>  >  >  > > I've never seen the "No server is running" message before.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > Cancel that. I had --drb in spec.opts, and it looks like there was a
>  >  >  > commit to make that work. Funny I never noticed that before.
>  >  >
>  >  >  It was broken until a recent changeset :)
>  >
>  >  I don't think it's working quite right.
>  >
>  >  1)
>  >  'A puzzle if rejected, when resaved, should be re-submitted' FAILED
>  >  expected rejected? to return true, got false
>  >  /Users/joe/projects/tanga/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/expectations.rb:52:in
>  >  `fail_with'
>  >  /Users/joe/projects/tanga/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/expectations/handler.rb:21:in
>  >  `handle_matcher'
>  >  /Users/joe/projects/tanga/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/expectations/extensions/object.rb:34:in
>  >  `should'
>  >  ./spec/models/puzzle_spec.rb:187:
>  >
>  >  Then this is the next executation:
>  >  ruby -S script/spec -O spec/spec.opts  spec/models/puzzle_spec.rb
>  >  /Users/joe/projects/tanga/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/expectations.rb
>  >
>  >  So it thiks that some rspec file was the cause of the crash.  If the
>  >  exception was raised from inside the Rails framework, then it tries to
>  >  re-run the Rails file, and that sometimes really messes things up.
>
>  What rspec revision?

trunk as of yesterday.


More information about the rspec-users mailing list