[rspec-users] params are making my "should redirect_to" test fail - why??
rick.denatale at gmail.com
Thu Feb 14 10:55:18 EST 2008
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:32 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Max Williams
> <toastkid.williams at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm new to rspec (and coding in general) but would it break a lot of
> > people's tests if redirect_to was changed to do this by default? It's what
> > i expected it to do, personally, that is to pass if the given :action and
> > :controller match up. If i pass a url string, and it's missing the params,
> > then it seems fair that it should fail, but if for example i just specify a
> > controller, and that controller is called (with any action) i'd expect it to
> > pass as well.
> > Like i say i'm a newb with no idea of the impact of this to existing tests
> > :)
> It is conceivable that existing examples could break, but the docs do
> set out the same expectation that you have.
> Can you file a bug at http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com so we can get it
> in the queue?
I guess I'll hold off on the patch then.
My blog on Ruby
More information about the rspec-users