[rspec-users] Rails 2.3
f.mischa at gmail.com
Wed Dec 17 18:18:48 EST 2008
Thank you for clarifying.
Yes, I mean edge rails.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:01 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Mischa Fierer <f.mischa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Wanted to point out to anyone having problems that rspec-rails 184.108.40.206
> > works with rails 2.3, while rspec 1.1.11 does not appear to.
> $ gem q -rn rails
> rails (2.2.2)
> Doesn't look like rails-2.3 is released. Do you mean edge rails?
> Also - just so we're all clear, any gem w/ a 4th part (like 220.127.116.11)
> is an interim, unofficial release that I make available at github as a
> convenience (http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/wikis/releases-and-gems).
> They get prefixed w/ my github username, so:
> $ gem q -rn dchelimsky-rspec
> dchelimsky-rspec (18.104.22.168)
> dchelimsky-rspec-rails (22.214.171.124)
> I just pushed updated gemspecs, so there should be a pair of 126.96.36.199
> gems up there soon (usually takes 15 to 30 minutes before they show
> up) that won't require you futzing with the manifest.
> > Also, to get rspec 188.8.131.52 to build I had to remove UPDATE from the
> > manifest.
> > M
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rspec-users