[rspec-users] Netbeans and .story files
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 15:18:09 EDT 2008
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Ashley Moran
<ashley.moran at patchspace.co.uk> wrote:
> On 01/04/2008, Martin Krauskopf <Martin.Krauskopf at sun.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > yes, the .story extension is not supported out-of-the box. Unfortunately
> > it is not possible to extend Ruby file-type now:
> > http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116563
> > But easy to fix inside of NetBeans. I've just fixed it on my local
> > machine. I'll commit in few hours.
> Hi Martin
> Sounds good. As it happens I will be working from home for a while so I get
> to use my MacBook instead of Ubuntu, yay :D But I'm sure I will have to use
> NetBeans again soon so I'll appreciate your patch.
> > BTW is the .story extension kind of "official" one? I saw in some
> > tutorials using .rb extension.
> Actually I've never been clear on this. I'd love a page on rspec.info that
> says This Is How You Should Name Your Files.
There's a reason such a page does not exist. We are letting convention
emerge rather than dictating it.
That said, the convention that I see emerging is .rb for stories
expressed in ruby and either no extension or .story for those
expressed in plain text.
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users