dchelimsky at gmail.com
Fri Sep 21 16:19:49 EDT 2007
On 9/21/07, Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Then I will have tens of methods that in fact has nothing really
> different from reused examples
But, as methods, they are more clearly differentiated for reuse.
The problem is that if I reuse an example, and then decide to change
that example, I may accidentally change the meaning of other examples.
This is possible w/ helper methods too, but I think it is less likely.
You can keep pursuing this if you like, but I can tell you right now
that it is very likely not going to happen. We already have a few
different ways to deal w/ reuse and this one seems more confusing to
me than helpful.
> On Sep 21, 2007, at 11:14 PM, lancecarlson at gmail.com wrote:
> > If you want to reuse stuff in your tests put those test methods in
> > a separate module and include them into you specs
> > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users