[rspec-users] [ANN] rspec_todo -- spec'ing backwards

[lancecarlson at gmail.com]

Yes that is nice because you know what files aren't really being used. That is asiming you tested everything that is being used!
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com>

Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:45:34 
To:rspec-users <rspec-users at rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] rspec_todo -- spec'ing backwards


>>
>>
>> I agree with David (you can also look at the ZenTest suite, which has
>> a similar tool).  I haven't looked at the tool, but how about
>> modifying it to create comments in the specs, somthing like this:
>>
>> # You haven't specified the behaviour of User#method1!
>> # You haven't specified the behaviour of User#method2!
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
>
> Why not use RCov?  Seeing a bunch of red is a much bigger motivator
> than a lame comment.

Good point.

Just out of curiosity - Have you noticed that rcov won't pick up all  
of the files in a Rails project unless there is an explicit spec file  
for it (or the class/model isn't called) ?

Scott

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users at rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users