[rspec-users] Going beyond the default html formatter/report?

Geoffrey Wiseman geoffrey.wiseman at gmail.com
Tue Sep 11 17:23:16 EDT 2007


On 9/11/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/11/07, Geoffrey Wiseman <geoffrey.wiseman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/9/07, Priit Tamboom <priit.tamboom at eesti.ee> wrote:
> > > I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html
> > formatter/report?
> > >
> >
> > Two things on that subject came up today, during some RSpec work.  It
> would
> > be nice if:
> >
> > The report contained pending messages, when specified, e.g.:
> > > describe "Secure passwords with MD5" do
> >
> > >     pending "Waiting on selection of an MD5 library."
> >
> > > end
> > >
> > The HTML report contains 'Secure passwords with MD5' as pending, but
> does
> > not add the explanation as to why.
> > It would be nice to be able to use DHTML expansion to see the source of
> the
> > spec, sometimes; when we're doing walkthroughs with the customer
> > representative, it's useful for him to be able to see the source as well
> as
> > the descriptions.   - Geoffrey
>
> These are great suggestions. Please, please, please put these in
> feature requests where they are guaranteed to stay on the radar and
> not on this list where they are guaranteed to get lost in the shuffle.
>

Sure; just wasn't sure if the people volunteering to look at the report were
likely to use the tracker, but ... I guess as long as they appear in the
tracker, that's the main thing, and then regardless of who implements them
and when, it's captured.
-- 
Geoffrey Wiseman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070911/8d54b8f7/attachment.html 


More information about the rspec-users mailing list