[rspec-users] Patch idea for rspec_on_rails

[Jerrett Taylor]

We have a similar one, which works like:


Foo.should have_association(:has_many, :conditions => "stuff", :through 
=> :bazes)

we started off with should have_many  etc, but it became overcomplicated 
with all the various things that you may want - so we changed to 
have_association to make it simpler and ensure it will work with any/all 
association options

http://pastie.caboo.se/108976





Russell Norris wrote:
> I recently wrote a matcher for testing AR associations which allows
> you to specify things like:
>
>     Foo.should have_many(:bars).through(:bazes)
>
> I'm pretty darned proud of it and a couple of people have suggested
> that I should submit it to the rspec_on_rails project. Before I go to
> the trouble of writing out rdoc and fully spec'ing it, I just wanted
> to make sure this was something the community would like.
>
> Instead of pasting in the code into the email, I thought I'd just make
> a pastie and let those interested read it there:
> http://pastie.caboo.se/108922
>
> I think it would make a nice addition to the current Rails matchers.
> Here's hoping you do too.
>
> RSL
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>