[rspec-users] Step matchers
lists-rspec at shopwatch.org
Mon Oct 15 18:55:02 EDT 2007
On 10/15/2007 10:11 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
> El 15/10/2007, a las 14:21, "Pat Maddox" <pergesu at gmail.com> escribió:
>> Jay mentioned antlr. This parser is so simple though that I doubt we
>> would need/want that. There's not really any parsing at all in fact.
>> You just look at each line, figure out what token it is, and pass the
>> following string to a constructor. It should be like 60 lines of Ruby
>> code, and we don't have any external dependencies.
> I've done a couple of month's work with ANTLR (3.0) this year and
> based on my experiences I'd say it's not the right tool for this kind
> of job. You use ANTLR if:
Yeah, I think you're right. I'd used ANTLR about eight years ago and
got the impression from casual browsing that 3.0 not only solved all
those problems, but was moving toward a ruby-hosted toolchain. Guess not.
Plus, I've never written a "real" parser, so I always try to find ways
to avoid doing so :)
More information about the rspec-users