[rspec-users] Step matchers

Mike Vincent mike at vincent.ws
Mon Oct 15 11:11:25 EDT 2007

On 10/15/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> Having this expression of stories and scenarios appearing devoid of
> programmatic ideas has great potential to help the customers feel
> ownership over stories/scenarios. Of course, there is an underlying
> relationship to syntax that they'd have to understand and, ideally,
> the system would help them out with (i.e. if they do write a new
> scenario with steps that don't match any existing steps, they'd be
> alerted). But that's all a bit down the road.
> Thoughts?

I for one really like where this seems to be heading. Reminds me
much of a php project with similar ambitions called Arbiter,
http://arbiter.sf.net. What's nice about this, is the customer plays
a hand in defining what the syntax is, deepening the buy in since I
can conceivably write matchers to work with the language the
customer uses rather than attempt to constrain them into using a
new vocabulary.

I haven't read all the posts in detail or given Pat's pasties a thorough
study but I'd assume there would/could also be a non-match catch
all matcher that could be used to identify steps that appear to
require a new matcher or perhaps needing to be reworded, etc. ?


More information about the rspec-users mailing list