[rspec-users] Down with Lambda!!
jonathan at parkerhill.com
Sun Nov 18 15:59:21 EST 2007
# for readability
alias :running :lambda
On Nov 18, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Shane Mingins wrote:
> On 18/11/2007, at 1:01 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> We're still writing Ruby here, aren't we!!!
> Wanted to share my initial reaction to your Ruby statement.
> Are we writing Ruby here? Or are we writing specifications? Are we
> not using the power of the Ruby language to construct a DSL that
> allows us to construct specifications about the behaviour of our code?
> Wouldn't the ideal be that I could create Behaviour specifications
> using RSpec or JSpec or CSpec (or whatever) using language that is
> natural to writing specifications? So something like lambda ...
> which is a word I always have trouble typing ;-) ... would not seem
> natural to the domain of BDD?
> These were just my initial thoughts :-)
> On the actual implementation side ... if I really wanted doing in my
> specs I would add the one line and not really care too much that this
> is what I need to do.
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users