[rspec-users] Down with Lambda!!
Wincent Colaiuta
win at wincent.com
Sun Nov 18 14:19:40 EST 2007
El 18/11/2007, a las 0:59, aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com escribió:
> Probably not. There was a longer discussion of it here:
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=13837&group_id=797&atid=3152
>
> As you point out, creating an alias is a one-liner.
> The main reason I don't want to add it is that lambda is a common
> idiom, and I don't want to set precedence of aliasing core Ruby idioms
> just because some people don't like the ones in Ruby.
<devil's advocate>
But it could be argued that RSpec is a Domain Specific Language of
its own, and it's not Ruby; it just happens to be implemented in Ruby.
</devil's advocate>
Having said that, I'm fine with using "lambda" and even if I wasn't
adding an alias to my spec_helper.rb would be no problem if I felt
strongly about it.
Cheers,
Wincent
More information about the rspec-users
mailing list