[rspec-users] Not sure why this is failing

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Sun Nov 18 11:16:41 EST 2007


On Nov 18, 2007 10:10 AM, Jonathan Linowes <jonathan at parkerhill.com> wrote:
> personally I find this to be one of the most frustrating things about
> rspec, well, rspec's stubs
> and wish the error messages could be much more helpful,
> rather than just telling that an expected method was not called, tell
> me if/when it was called with some other args instead
> (if this causes excessive overhead, perhaps a runtime option like, --
> trace "Address.new" )

This sounds reasonable. Please submit a ticket to the tracker. A patch
would be best, but a bug report would be fine to get it on the radar.

Cheers,
David

>
> --linoj
>
>
>
> On Nov 17, 2007, at 11:50 PM, s.ross wrote:
>
> > Try with(nil)
> >
> > I think params[:user] will return nil.
> >
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2007, at 8:18 PM, __iso __ wrote:
> >
> >>>> Address.should_receive(:new).with(no_args).and_return @address
> >>
> >> That doesn't seem to work either.  I had also tried with :any and
> >> that
> >> failed as well.
> >>
> >> It does seem to work when removing the .with() call though.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rspec-users mailing list
> >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>


More information about the rspec-users mailing list