[rspec-users] it "should [action] ..." vs it with an active voice
pergesu at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 22:03:28 EST 2007
On 11/12/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 8:09 PM, Pat Maddox <pergesu at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The difference is that the story is an authoritative
> > spec of how the system should behave, and the description has no
> > authority at all.
> I don't have that sense at all. Where do you get that from?
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>From the belief that the customer is the ultimate authority on what it
means for the system to behave acceptably, and the fact that stories
are customer-facing and specs are developer-facing.
More information about the rspec-users