[rspec-users] be_success misleading
aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com
Sat Nov 10 12:12:25 EST 2007
be_success has the same semantics (and uses) Response#success? and
that's not our API, but Rails'
If you don't like Rails' semantics you can make your own matcher, but
I don't want to invent a whole new API on top of Rails in the official
On Nov 10, 2007 5:31 PM, Steve <vertebrate at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone else thinks that 'response.should be_success' is
> potentially misleading. If you're writing a spec for an action that is
> failing in some way it can still have a status 200. So while the
> HTTP request was technically successful, something in the action
> was not. Perhaps something like 'response.should have_success_status'?
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users