[rspec-users] a better "should have valid associations"
aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 12:02:59 EDT 2007
On 3/29/07, Josh Knowles <joshknowles at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/29/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > AWESOME! I'm so psyched to see a plugin emerging for this.
I second that.
> > Looks like have_many and belong_to don't really specify the specific
> > type of association, so you could get false positives. Also, it
> > probably needs a have_one and have_and_belong_to_many matchers is well
> > to round it out, no?
> Yes this is definitely still a work in progress, and I wasn't quite ready to
> release, but figured since folks were talking about this now I'd throw it
> out there and get feedback earlier rather then later.
Now that the rspec plugin mechanism seems to be working nicely, we
don't have to include lots of stuff in the Spec::Rails codebase.
However, we should make sure the RSpec website includes a link to
valuable plugins like this one.
> Josh Knowles
> joshknowles at gmail.com
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users