[rspec-users] it_should_behave_like

Scott Taylor mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com
Thu Jun 21 12:52:44 EDT 2007


What is the shared behavior between these two?  Do you want a valid,  
saved, and accepted contract to act like an unaccepted contract?   
Abstract out what is common between them, and then use that as the  
shared description.

See:  http://pastie.caboo.se/72413

Best,

Scott


On Jun 21, 2007, at 10:24 AM, Jordan McKible wrote:

> I'm trying to use it_should_behave_like, and something seems to be  
> wonky with the syntax.  When I add :shared=>true, the DSL complains  
> that the next line is the fixture declaration:
>
> /vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec
> /dsl/behaviour_eval.rb:137:in `method_missing': undefined method  
> `fixtures' for #<Spec::DSL::EvalModule:0x324a2cc> (NoMethodError)
>
> Here's the spec http://pastie.caboo.se/72287
>
> Am I using it_should_behave_like properly?  Am I making a separate  
> mistake? I have RSpec setup as a svn external (currently rev2101).
>
> Thanks,
> Jordan
> http://jordan.mckible.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users



More information about the rspec-users mailing list