[rspec-users] "they" synonym for "it"?

aslak hellesoy aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 12:53:46 EDT 2007


On 7/12/07, Anthony Carlos <anthony at digitalphenom.com> wrote:
> If you guys don't mind, I'm going to create a sample web page with
> this concept on it, stealing from Ashley and David's writings. If
> people like it, perhaps we can get it included in the documentation.
>

Go ahead, that would be great!

Aslak

> On Jul 11, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Ashley Moran wrote:
>
> >
> > On 11 Jul 2007, at 17:12, Anthony Carlos wrote:
> >
> >> What do you think?
> >
> >
> > I think there's a lot of merit in that idea.  I've come across loads
> > of situations where it was not obvious how to write the specs or code
> > so that the code or specs (respectively) are clear and useful.  I'm
> > sure they could be distilled to a set of template situations - I'd be
> > happy to submit examples.
> >
> > When people ask what developing with tests is like I tend to say that
> > the difference between using RSpec and writing specs is like the
> > difference between learning how a paintbrush works and learning how
> > to paint a picture.  RSpec's easy enough to pick up, but I wish I
> > could point people at a more theoretical how-to that helps with the
> > difficult "how do I spec this?" problems.
> >
> > Ashley
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>


More information about the rspec-users mailing list