[rspec-users] should expectation syntax has changed
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Sat Jan 27 14:55:19 EST 2007
To be clear, this ONLY applies to those of you using trunk and
experimenting with an un-released feature supporting custom
To those of you who are, it is now pretty much how it will be
released, so if you use #matches?, failure_message and
negative_failure_message you should be OK.
On 1/27/07, s.ross <cwdinfo at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is just a note in case anyone else is using the (I believe
> experimental) custom expectations.
> The custom expectation I had written used the custom 'met_by?'
> function, which now appears to have been replaced by the 'matches?'
> function to determine whether the expectation is met.
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users