[rspec-users] Story runner rake task
james.deville at gmail.com
Thu Dec 20 00:50:33 EST 2007
On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:44 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:40 PM, James Deville <james.deville at gmail.com>
>> On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:38 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>> On Dec 19, 2007 11:34 PM, James Deville <james.deville at gmail.com>
>>>> Yeah, had a slight email conversation with David C about that in
>>>> regards to bug #188. I am wondering why we don't standardize it, ya
>>>> know convention over configuration and all.
>>> Because I think it's premature to call anything related to story
>>> runner a convention. I actually organize them differently from what
>>> many are calling convention, and my way is not necessarily "right"
>>> "better." Let's wait a while on this. We'll get there.
>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>> Good enough for me. I just wanted a reason. May I ask how you set
> stories/steps/ (steps go in here - that seems to be the "convention")
> So in this case, the only thing that would be consistent across
> projects would be helper.rb and the steps directory. Even that should
> probably be called step_definitions or something. I'm not sure.
> Anyhow - that's where I'm at. How about you?
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
I've been doing a feature per file. So I have:
So in stories/stories I have my stories with multiple scenarios per
I'm definitely seeing your point, and the reason for leaving it as is.
Do you use selenium or anything like that via the stories? If not,
what kinds of things do you test with stories?
More information about the rspec-users