[rspec-users] Rspec 1.0.8 with Rails 2.0
Stefan Magnus Landrø
stefan.landro at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 03:11:46 EST 2007
Would it make sense to put up a page on an RSpec wiki where a table of good
combinations (versions of rails and rspec) would be maintained? Anyway, I
think a wiki would be a good idea.
2007/12/13, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>:
> On Dec 12, 2007 10:17 PM, Pat Maddox <pergesu at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 12, 2007 4:01 AM, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com>
> > > On Dec 12, 2007 12:48 AM, Yitzhak Bar Geva <yitzhakbg at gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > Is it OK to go ahead and generate a Rails 2.0 project with RSpec
> 1.0.8? Am I
> > > > likely to run into problems?
> > >
> > > When we released RSpec 1.0.8 there was no Rails 2.0. We always have to
> > > do a fair amount of tweaks to keep up with Rails, so the versions
> > > you're talking about are incompatible.
> > >
> > > As a general rule: Each RSpec release will work with the latest Rails
> > > at the time of release. If you want to use a newer Rails, use RSpec
> > > trunk.
> > Do you think it would make sense to do an interim release of RSpec
> > whenever a new Rails version gets released?
> We try to do releases right after rails releases - that's why we're
> working hard to get 1.1 out the door now.
> > It (probably) shouldn't
> > be based off of trunk, but rather the last stable release, with
> > whatever little bug fixes may be required to work with Rails. That
> > way there's no question...for any Rails version, people have the
> > choice of using a stable version of RSpec trunk.
> > Pat
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
Bekk Open Source
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rspec-users