[rspec-users] Does mock_model's :null_object option work?

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Wed Dec 5 10:53:40 EST 2007


On Dec 5, 2007 9:36 AM, Al Chou <hotfusionman at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Uh, shouldn't they both work?   I use TRUE (and FALSE) because I like the
> facts that a) they stand out typographically and b) they are Ruby constants.
> I can't believe the case of the letters matters, unless you are doing
> something meta-programmingy rather than just passing the value through to
> whatever is receiving it....

Did you see my earlier email acknowledging that the problem was not
true/TRUE, but was likely the version of the plugin you are using?
1.0.8 does not support :null_object. Trunk does.

>
> Al
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Tom Stuart <tom at experthuman.com>
> To: rspec-users <rspec-users at rubyforge.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 7:17:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Does mock_model's :null_object option work?
>
>  On 5 Dec 2007, at 15:02, David Chelimsky wrote:
> >>  @order_address = mock_model( OrderAddress, :null_object => TRUE )
> > :null_object => true (lower case) should work.
>
> Well, I'm talking bollocks then, aren't I?
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
>  ________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it
> now.
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>


More information about the rspec-users mailing list