[rspec-users] undefined method `mock_model' for [RSpec example]:#<Class:0x25550a8>
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Mon Aug 20 09:47:18 EDT 2007
On 8/20/07, Jay Levitt <lists-rspec at shopwatch.org> wrote:
> aslak hellesoy wrote:
> > On 8/20/07, Jay Levitt <lists-rspec at shopwatch.org> wrote:
> >>> I'd like to avoid that because it would be extra noise and it
> >>> shouldn't be necessary. The generated specs work absolutely perfectly
> >>> for me as/is (I'm on OS X). There have been a couple of bugs related
> >>> to regexps and windows paths over time, but they've either been
> >>> resolved or await more feedback from users in the tracker.
> >>> I'm thinking about other ways to be explicit about this (besides the
> >>> verbose ":behaviour_type => :view". What if we added methods like:
> >>> describe_model
> >>> describe_view
> >>> describe_controller
> >>> describe_helper
> >>> Or support the first argument being a Symbol:
> >>> describe :model, "Thing" do
> >> I'm not clear why we need any new syntax at all - isn't this just a bug
> >> related to some configurations, if it works for David but not for Zach
> >> (both on OS X)?
> > Good point. Let's figure out why it doesn't work for Zach first.
> > Zach: What's the relative path of the spec? Did you move it after it
> > was created?
> If Zach could create a screencast or precise step-by-step, I can attempt
> to reproduce it tonight on OS X, Windows XP, Cygwin, and/or Ubuntu 6.06.
Thanks for offering to do this Jay - that's great.
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users