[rspec-users] undefined method `mock_model' for [RSpec example]:#<Class:0x25550a8>

aslak hellesoy aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com
Mon Aug 20 08:20:54 EDT 2007


On 8/20/07, Jay Levitt <lists-rspec at shopwatch.org> wrote:
> > I'd like to avoid that because it would be extra noise and it
> > shouldn't be necessary. The generated specs work absolutely perfectly
> > for me as/is (I'm on OS X). There have been a couple of bugs related
> > to regexps and windows paths over time, but they've either been
> > resolved or await more feedback from users in the tracker.
> >
> > I'm thinking about other ways to be explicit about this (besides the
> > verbose ":behaviour_type => :view". What if we added methods like:
> >
> > describe_model
> > describe_view
> > describe_controller
> > describe_helper
> >
> > Or support the first argument being a Symbol:
> >
> > describe :model, "Thing" do
>
> I'm not clear why we need any new syntax at all - isn't this just a bug
> related to some configurations, if it works for David but not for Zach
> (both on OS X)?
>

Good point. Let's figure out why it doesn't work for Zach first.

Zach: What's the relative path of the spec? Did you move it after it
was created?

Aslak

> Jay
> >
> > I'm not sure I like those, but I kind of dislike :behaviour_type =>
> > :foo as a default.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >> Zach
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rspec-users mailing list
> >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>


More information about the rspec-users mailing list