[rspec-users] undefined method `mock_model' for [RSpec example]:#<Class:0x25550a8>
lists-rspec at shopwatch.org
Mon Aug 20 07:52:21 EDT 2007
> I'd like to avoid that because it would be extra noise and it
> shouldn't be necessary. The generated specs work absolutely perfectly
> for me as/is (I'm on OS X). There have been a couple of bugs related
> to regexps and windows paths over time, but they've either been
> resolved or await more feedback from users in the tracker.
> I'm thinking about other ways to be explicit about this (besides the
> verbose ":behaviour_type => :view". What if we added methods like:
> Or support the first argument being a Symbol:
> describe :model, "Thing" do
I'm not clear why we need any new syntax at all - isn't this just a bug
related to some configurations, if it works for David but not for Zach
(both on OS X)?
> I'm not sure I like those, but I kind of dislike :behaviour_type =>
> :foo as a default.
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users