[rspec-users] should_receive, used in the wrong place?
court3nay at gmail.com
Fri Aug 17 17:47:09 EDT 2007
That's exactly my point; enforcing the difference between
should_receive vs stub!
On 8/17/07, Lance Carlson <lancecarlson at gmail.com> wrote:
> what about template.should_receive(:current_user)?
> I don't know if that's a bad idea to do that in the before(:each) but
> it's more convenient..
> On 8/17/07, Courtenay <court3nay at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What do you guys think of this: if someone calls should_receive
> > outside of an "it" block, it warns you.
> > before(:each) do
> > @foo = Foo.new
> > @foo.should_receive(:monkeys)
> > end
> > would warn you that you're setting an expectation in the wrong place,
> > and that "stub" is correct when setting up objects.
> > Opinions?
> > courtenay
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users