[rspec-users] ActsAsList specs
steve.tooke at gmail.com
Thu Aug 16 07:57:40 EDT 2007
Hmm that's true.
If the acts_as_list implementation changed, or is removed then this
isn't going to work. But you don't really want to go down the rabbit
warren of checking that the whole of the acts_as_list implementation
works as expected, as presumably that's already tested.
Perhaps I'm just being over complicated, and you could just mock the
call to acts_as_list?
Of course that still wouldn't guard against the acts_as_list behaviour
changing to something that doesn't match what you were trying to
Thanks, more to think about!
On 8/15/07, Courtenay <court3nay at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/15/07, Steve Tooke <steve.tooke at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > How are people specifying models which act_as_list?
> > I'm thinking that it would be possible to check that acts_as_list
> > instance methods have been added to a class using something like this:
> You're specing the code not the behavior.
> This will make double-work if you want to change anything.
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users