[rspec-users] changes in 0.8 and greater - should_

[Scott Taylor]

Thanks for the info, Aslak.

What is the appropriate form of render in the view specs to use?

Doing something like this:

render "users/1/terms"

gives me:

/users/1/terms/index.html.erb

I'm using restful-routes and markaby.

I know there was a bug in the tracker about markaby templates.  I'll  
follow up on that if this is the case here.

Scott



On Apr 9, 2007, at 4:43 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:

> On 4/9/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:
>>
>> Has the should_... syntax changed?  I'm getting errors when running
>> the following:
>>
>> should_render(:index)
>> should_be_valid
>> should_not_be_valid
>> should_respond_to
>> should_be
>> should_render
>>
>
> Object now only gets monkeypatched with two methods: should and  
> should_not.
> should_anything_else will no longer work.
>
>> I  thought the syntax changed to something like the following:
>>
>> obj.should render(:index)
>>
>
> Syntactically, yes. But the API has changed too, so now you must say:
> response.should render_template(:index)
>
> See doc/output/rdoc-rails/index.html
> (rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/rails/matchers.rb RDoc) and
> example_rails_app/spec/controllers/people_controller_spec.rb for
> details.
>
> Aslak
>
>> but this doesn't seem to work.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users