[rspec-users] Stubs breaking other things
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Wed Dec 13 04:38:00 EST 2006
On 12/12/06, David Goodlad <dgoodlad at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All
> I'm working on converting some existing controller specs to use mocks
> and stubs rather than real ActiveRecord objects in a Rails project.
> In one of my controller actions, I use a database transaction. So,
> the obvious thing to do is have this in my setup block:
> Firstly, is there an easy way to have that stub yield to the block
> passed to any #transaction calls?
Stubs won't do this right now (feel free to add an RFE saying they
should), but you can do this w/ a mock. Just set it to
any_number_of_times and it works just like a stub:
> I'm sure there's an easy way to do
> it but I can't seem to find it.
> Secondly, it seems that stubbing the transaction method in one context
> breaks all sorts of other stuff. I'm assuming that since AR uses
> transactions for saving records, any project that gets saved in code
> that actually uses the real Project model instead of a mock is now
> broken. Is the stub code, in the case of a partial mock, supposed to
> revert any methods it overrides upon teardown?
It is supposed to, and there was a problem with this a while ago, but
we *believe* that we fixed it in 0.7.4. Which version are you using?
More information about the rspec-users