<br>I'm just a rspec beginner but I would vote for DOT since it's a bit easier on my finger :-)<br>My little finger is overwork already.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/6/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">David Chelimsky
</b> <<a href="mailto:dchelimsky@gmail.com">dchelimsky@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On 6/6/06, Lachie <
<a href="mailto:lachiec@gmail.com">lachiec@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> The dots made me look twice at rSpec in the first place, but it was<br>> more because it was such a novel approach.<br>><br>> in the end
<br>> +1 Underscore<br>><br><br>Bear in mind that the initial syntax was underscores. The dots were<br>introduced later in order to make the implementation simpler and more<br>robust. So from an implementation standpoint, I'd prefer to only
<br>support dots. From a usability standpoint, I'd like to use<br>underscores. So, since I live on both sides of that divide:<br><br>+. 5 Dots<br>+ .5 Underscores<br>_______________________________________________<br>Rspec-devel mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:Rspec-devel@rubyforge.org">Rspec-devel@rubyforge.org</a><br><a href="http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel">http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel</a><br></blockquote></div><br>