[rspec-devel] this library needs a better name

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Sun May 3 13:54:38 EDT 2009


On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:40 PM, aslak hellesoy
<aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Mark Wilden <mark at mwilden.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 11:12 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The basic idea is that you use the stubble method to define a family
>>> of stubs on a model class and the instance it returns for new(),
>>> find(), create(), and create!(). There's a bit more than that, but
>>> it's an infant right now, and there are certainly going to be holes in
>>> it, but the biggest hole at the moment is its name :)
>>
>> Since the library is for stubbing models, I actually like the name
>> stubble.
>
> Why not include it in rspec-rails?

I may eventually, but I want to prove it out for a bit before adding
it to the mile long list of shit that I have to maintain in rspec
rails to maintain compatibility.

>
> Aslak
>
>>
>> ///ark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-devel mailing list
>> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>


More information about the rspec-devel mailing list