[rspec-devel] require 'rubygems'
peter.fitzgibbons at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 06:49:36 EDT 2009
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Jim Weirich <jim.weirich at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2009, at 3:04 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> That's essentially what's happening in this branch, though it's
>> wrapped in a method to reduce duplication.
> Duplication? How many places need to do this?
> Seems to me that any libraries don't need this. By the time the libraries
> are loading, rubygems should already be loaded (otherwise the libraries
> wouldn't have been found).
> I only put this in the top level application code. One place.
> At least this is true for rake. Is rspec different?
I'm with you. Also this seems to also be taken care of through RUBYOPT, no?
Email: peter.fitzgibbons at gmail.com
> -- Jim Weirich
> -- jim.weirich at gmail.com
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rspec-devel