[rspec-devel] [Proposal] change 'spec' to 'rspec'

Dean Wampler deanwampler at gmail.com
Mon Sep 29 23:28:39 EDT 2008


On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:22 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>wrote:

> The convention for gems is that the top level module shares a name
> with the gem, but rspec uses 'spec' instead, resulting in things like
> this:
> require 'rubygems'
> gem 'rspec'
> require 'spec'
> I'd like to propose that we change the 'spec' namespace to 'rspec'.
> We'd have to continue to support 'spec' for backwards compatibility
> for a long time, but we can do that with a few extra files that just
> require other files.
> Thoughts?
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel

Dean Wampler
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-devel/attachments/20080929/898b8859/attachment.html>

More information about the rspec-devel mailing list