[rspec-devel] Pulling the story runner out of rspec/rspec-rails
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Sat Nov 1 16:54:39 EDT 2008
Depend on rspec (as it does now) - that's fine.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Chad Humphries <chad.humphries at gmail.com> wrote:
> My fork of RSpec has the story runner extracted. I have a question
> about the story runner gem though. Is is to be more of a stand-alone
> gem ala cucumber, or can it be dependent on RSpec? I think I have an
> approach working with a dependency on RSpec now.
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:56 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Chad Humphries
>> <chad.humphries at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hey again,
>>> I've been working on my fork of RSpec recently and I have removed
>>> story runner a few different ways. I can pull it out into it's own
>>> gem fairly quickly, although the gem will require a little more of my
>>> time to make it prim and proper for public consumption. My question
>>> is this, do you still want the story runner pulled out into a separate
>>> gem? I'm not interested into maintaining it long-term, but I do have
>>> some time to take care of the extraction and hand off to whomever
>>> would like to.
>> This is definitely in the plan. I wasn't planning to tackle it until
>> later this year, perhaps early '09, but if you can get it working and
>> clean and simple (so there is a separate rspec-stories gem), then I'd
>> be glad to release it sooner.
>> Thanks for the effort!
>>> rspec-devel mailing list
>>> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
>> rspec-devel mailing list
>> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-devel