[rspec-devel] RSpec mocks running when Flexmock is configured
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Sat May 24 18:59:35 EDT 2008
On May 24, 2008, at 11:40 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On May 24, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Jim Weirich wrote:
>> On May 24, 2008, at 9:15 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>> I think that changing rspec to support multiple mocking frameworks
>>> would require removing the Object-invasion you speak of. If I were
>>> starting from scratch, that's definitely the direction I'd want to
>>> go. Given that there are a lot of examples in the world that
>>> exploit that, it would be counter-productive for us to change that
>>> decision at this point.
>> Agreed. I've changed flexmock so that it will override the global
>> "should_receive" with its own definition, but only on objects that
>> are explicitly given to flexmock for mocking. That solves half the
>> problem. The other half of the problem is that RSpec mocks are not
>> torn down once flexmock is configured. Supporting multiple mocking
>> frameworks might be as easy as making sure all mock libraries get
>> properly "hooked" into the teardown process. I see no reason why
>> flexmock couldn't live comfortably with the RSpec mock in that case.
> Interesting idea. Any chance we can spend a little while working on
> this together in Portland?
I separated the extensions of Object and Class from the rest of the
mock framework. render_observer now requires 'spec/mocks/framework'
instead of 'spec/mocks'
This should solve this problem for you, Jim. Please let me know if it
You'll need to update both vendor/plugins/rspec and vendor/plugins/
More information about the rspec-devel