[rspec-devel] additions to rspec_on_rails
technoweenie at gmail.com
Mon Jan 7 22:45:49 EST 2008
> I think there is room for both. I think these are different
> conceptually. What are being described here are more akin to custom
> matchers, but exposed at a higher level.
That's what we were going for. However, the pastie you showed does
pretty much the same thing if I change a single . to a _. It also has
the benefit of not requiring any internal patching.
More information about the rspec-devel