[rspec-devel] Trac instead of Rubyforge tracker?

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Mon Sep 10 09:12:18 EDT 2007


On 9/10/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/8/07, rupert <rupert_apsc at rupespad.com> wrote:
> > If you'd find an rss feed of commits to the repository would make
> > your life easier, then you can use:
> >
> > http://subtlety.errtheblog.com/
> >
> > to keep track of things - it works very nicely!
>

We already have http://subtlety.errtheblog.com/O_o/1e.xml, but we have
no sort of changes viewer. So you can see when changes happen and what
files get changed and even the commit comment, but you can't see the
source changes.

> > Cheers
> >
> > Rupert
> >
> >
> > On 6 Sep 2007, at 00:42, Michael Klishin wrote:
> >
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to follow RSpec development but constantly find out that I
> > > have no time to read all emails from dev list and read commit logs /
> > > source changes.
> > >
> > > Maybe it makes sense to set up Trac? Beside being a bit better at
> > > tracking requests and bug reports it has Timeline and Roadmap that
> > > save
> > > huge amount of time compared to SVN logs and source digging.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > --
> > > MK
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rspec-devel mailing list
> > > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-devel mailing list
> > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> >
>


More information about the rspec-devel mailing list