[rspec-devel] Trac instead of Rubyforge tracker?
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Mon Sep 10 09:12:18 EDT 2007
On 9/10/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/8/07, rupert <rupert_apsc at rupespad.com> wrote:
> > If you'd find an rss feed of commits to the repository would make
> > your life easier, then you can use:
> > http://subtlety.errtheblog.com/
> > to keep track of things - it works very nicely!
We already have http://subtlety.errtheblog.com/O_o/1e.xml, but we have
no sort of changes viewer. So you can see when changes happen and what
files get changed and even the commit comment, but you can't see the
> > Cheers
> > Rupert
> > On 6 Sep 2007, at 00:42, Michael Klishin wrote:
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to follow RSpec development but constantly find out that I
> > > have no time to read all emails from dev list and read commit logs /
> > > source changes.
> > >
> > > Maybe it makes sense to set up Trac? Beside being a bit better at
> > > tracking requests and bug reports it has Timeline and Roadmap that
> > > save
> > > huge amount of time compared to SVN logs and source digging.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > --
> > > MK
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rspec-devel mailing list
> > > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-devel mailing list
> > rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
More information about the rspec-devel