[rspec-devel] Congrats & stubbing methods with specific args question

Scott Taylor mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com
Sat Sep 1 14:18:35 EDT 2007

On Sep 1, 2007, at 1:33 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:

> On 9/1/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:
>> Congratulations on the 1.0.9 release!
> Huh? Release? News to me.
>> This release, I think, is
>> worth at least a major version number (if not 2.0)- with rbehave, the
>> internals of rspec completely refactored, the textmate bundle with
>> lots of new features, enhancements to the mocking framework, etc.  So
>> thanks for all the hard work - especially Dan North, Brian Takita -
>> and the usual suspects: David & Aslak.
> We'll probably make it 1.1. There's still a lot of unification of the
> runners to happen before we get anywhere near a 2.0.
>> Just one thing on the changeset that I saw:
>> * You can now stub!(:msg).with(specific args)
>>   Does this mean that a stub with specific args will only be stubbed
>> in those cases, but in others it will act as if it weren't?
> Not quite. It means that you can set up different stub return values
> for different argument values, but it does NOT mean that the call will
> be passed on to the object if those values are not sent in. Once you
> stub or mock a method on a real object, that method is owned by the
> mock framework.

So say you have the following


and the object receives:


Is there something like a MockExpectationError which is raised?


More information about the rspec-devel mailing list