[rspec-devel] new pending feature (pending release)
aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com
Tue Jun 26 02:57:41 EDT 2007
On 6/26/07, Bob Cotton <bob.cotton at rallydev.com> wrote:
> "David Chelimsky" <dchelimsky at gmail.com> writes:
> > I just added a new "pending" feature. It's in trunk (rev 2118+) and
> > will be part of the 1.0.6 release (*probably* within the next week).
> > Read all about it:
> > http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/articles/2007/06/23/pending-insert-reason-here
> A very nice feature.
> Here's a twist to consider:
> We use rspec for functional testing of a large-ish
> application. Sometimes we find bugs that may take some time to be
> resolved, a few days, a few weeks. Once the bug is identified, I don't
> want to see it failing the nightly builds, day after day.
> pending() might be useful here, as I can say:
> pending("Bug 12345 being fixed")
> But then I would have to wrap this in some conditional logic that
> tests if the bug is actually fixed.
> But, what if pending took a block:
> pending("Bug 12345 being fixed") do
> actual.should == expected
> and pending would fail (not with a pending exception) once the code
> inside the block started passing?
> That way we could mark something as a know issue, and be notified when
> that thing was fixed and go removed the pending.
I think that's a great idea. It could be coloured blue in the output.
> - Bob
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-devel