[rspec-devel] mock framework

[Michael Klishin]

Most people use what is by default. Others do not care whether there is 
a default framework, they use what they like or need. So I find process 
of making decision on this endless.

You may add an option to rspec generator and raise an exception if user 
do not specify what mocking framework to use. You may extract current 
one that RSpec uses. All these efforts will be confusing for most of 
RSpec users who just want stuff work, not be "vendor neutral".

The only benefit I see is that you can end up using the same framework 
Test::Unit does. And yes, you still have to use something by default 
(people will be telling you you prefer it, think about it). This will 
make a transition from T::U to RSpec a bit easier.

In the long run this is a useless move to me. We're better concentrate 
on RBehave merging and so forth.

David Chelimsky wrote:
> One thing I do NOT want to do is have RSpec prefer one framework over
> another.
> 
> Thoughts?

--
MK