[rspec-devel] Refactorings merged into Trunk

[David Chelimsky]

On 8/21/07, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/21/07, Brian Takita <brian at pivotallabs.com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure if having 3 solutions is confusing, especially if people
> > are used to it. I'm curious if this would make it easier to learn
> > rspec coming from an xUnit world. I certainly have heard the question
> > "how do I x out my specs" several times.
> >
>
> Is it harder to answer "put a pending statement as the first statement
> the block" than "replace it with xit"?
>
> > >From personal experience, I reimplement this method quite often in
> > projects I'm involved with because people find it easy to use and
> > remember.
> > Its also the easiest solution to search and replace on the table.
> >
> > > make us look wishy-washy ;-)
> > I prefer responding to users' needs.
> >
> > Is this something that can be voted on?
> >
>
> Sure! =)
>
> -1

-1 more. There are already 3 ways to do pending, because the pending
method lets you wrap some code in a block, or not.

>
> Aslak
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>